Approximate reading time: 6-8 min. Successful collaboration between competing product development teams requires the use of formal controls. These controls are used in parallel to coordinate the teams’ interdependent development activities, and in parallel to encourage teams to collaborate. However, previous theoretical and empirical research suggests that the formal management control required to improve coordination can also lead to co-operative and opportunistic behavior. Can collaboration with competitors product development team really work?
Collaboration with competitors product development team
One study was conducted to help just the product development team managers, who collaborate with competing teams, to choose appropriate controls. The researchers studied the impact of a partner team’s use of input, process, and output-based control on the partner’s (competing teams) view of the effectiveness of coordination and the behavior of the collaboration.
A scenario-based experiment was conducted with 110 experts. The results show that managers perceive the competing team’s use of input-based controls as malicious and process-based control to help achieve effective coordination. In addition, managers were positive to the competitor’s use of input-based controls. They were also negative to the competitor’s use of output-based controls in collaboration. See Table 1 below.
Table 1 – Result
|Typ of formal controls||Effect on coordination||Effect on collaboration|
|Process-based controls||Positive||Not significant|
|Output-based controls||Not significant||Negative|
Overall, the results indicate that no single set of formal controls improves both coordination and collaboration in competing product development co-operation. The use of input-based control results in opposite effects on coordination and collaboration. Product development team managers must very carefully choose the right types of formal controls. This must be done in order for competing product development collaboration to succeed. Below in Table 2 is a tentative model that can be used.
Table 2 – Tentative control matrix
|Effect on collaboration|
|Effect on coordination||High||Process- and input-based controls||Process-based controls|
Thus, the combination of input-based and process-based control should be done very carefully. The positive effect of process-based coordination must not be offset by the negative effect of input-based control.
Smets, L. P.M., Langerak, F., Tatikonda, M.V., 2015. Collaboration between competitors’ NPD teams: in search of effective modes of management control. R&D Management.
Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/radm.12156?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
Mer från InventiveBoard
To materialize investments in innovation capabilities
Approximate reading time: 5-7 min. In innovative environments, companies face a control problem. On the one hand, management needs to guide employees by monitoring goals and behaviors. But on the other hand, management must also ensure that employees have enough space to search for innovative…Läs mer
Management control in radical innovation
Approximate reading time: 2-3 min. A study sought to explore whether, how and why different approaches to management control in radical innovations are more intensely employed: (1) in different phases of the radical innovation process, and (2) in innovation projects showing different degrees of radicalness. Case studies…Läs mer